https://biobus.swst.org/index.php/bpbj/issue/feedBioProducts Business2026-05-26T16:24:32+00:00Pipiet Larasatiepipiet@vt.eduOpen Journal Systems<p><em>BioProducts Business</em>, a refereed journal from the Society of Wood Science and Technology (SWST), is indexed in:</p> <p>1. <a href="https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/21101058047#tabs=1">Scopus</a></p> <p>2. <a style="background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 0.875rem;" href="https://doaj.org/toc/2378-1394">Directory of Open Access Journals</a><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;"> </span><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">(DOAJ)</span></p> <p>3. <a href="https://kanalregister.hkdir.no/publiseringskanaler/KanalTidsskriftInfo.action?id=494765">Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers</a></p> <p>We look forward to your submissions. First published in 2016, <em>BioProducts Business</em> is an open access journal that is a continuation of the former Journal of Forest Products Business Research. Published articles can be found here: <a href="https://biobus.swst.org/index.php/bpbj/issue/archive">https://biobus.swst.org/index.php/bpbj/issue/archive</a></p> <p> </p> <div>BioBus is dedicated to advance theoretical and practical understanding of wide ranging business topics related to wood products, bio/renewable products, and non-wood products and services. The journal publishes timely, rigorous, technically sound, and scientific manuscripts. It strives to disseminate new knowledge bridging the scientific and professional communities. By achieving these aims it is the top-tier, high impact journal in the field.</div>https://biobus.swst.org/index.php/bpbj/article/view/203Multi-rater assessment in systematic reviews: A methodological innovation in forest higher education literature 2026-03-17T11:02:01+00:00Pipiet Larasatiepipiet@vt.eduBambang Sumintonobambang.sumintono@uiii.ac.idSandra Rodríguez-Piñerosspineros@uach.mxRene Zamora-Cristalesrene.zamora@oregonstate.eduAnnie Bijuanniebiju124@gmail.comKamana Chamlagainkch062@email.latech.edu<p>Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are essential for synthesizing evidence in forest higher education, yet the reliability of article selection often hinges on subjective expert judgment. As forest education evolves to meet global challenges, such as climate change, digitalization, and market dynamics, educators must navigate an overwhelming volume of literature to identify high-quality science that fosters critical thinking and holistic understanding. This study introduces the Many Facet Rasch Model (MFRM) as a methodological innovation for evaluating multi-rater assessments of the forest higher education literature, offering a transparent and replicable framework for evidence synthesis. Five experts, who served as raters, assessed ten articles using six calibrated criteria (originality, comprehensiveness of literature review, methodology, scientific value of findings, related issues with forest higher education, and quality of analysis). The results demonstrate that MFRM can identify psychometrically sound evaluations, rank article quality, and diagnose criteria, particularly in comprehensiveness of the literature review and difficulty, most notably in literature review comprehensiveness and methodological rigor. This research provides practical guidance for forest higher education practitioners seeking to select pedagogically valuable resources. By enhancing transparency and reproducibility in literature evaluation, MFRM strengthens forest higher education’s capacity to train future foresters with precision, integrity, and relevance.</p>2026-05-26T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Pipiet Larasatie, Dr. Bambang Sumintono, Dr. Sandra Rodríguez-Piñeros, Dr. Rene Zamora-Cristales, Annie Biju, Kamana Chamlagain