FAMILIARITY, USE, AND PERCEPTIONS OF WOOD BUILDING PRODUCTS: A SURVEY AMONG ARCHITECTS ON THE UNITED STATES WEST COAST
Keywords:
architect perceptions, engineered wood products, wood construction industryAbstract
A wide variety of wood products exist for both structural and non-structural uses; however, the material is still underutilized in non-residential construction in the United States. Since architects are one of the key decision makers for material selection in the construction sector, we investigated architects’ familiarity, use, and perceptions of wood products. We contacted American Institute of Architects certified architects on the US West Coast, a prominent area for the forest product industry, to complete a questionnaire. The responding architects’ familiarity with wood products and the use of wood products showed a positive relationship. Durability, fire resistance, and strength were seen as weaknesses of wood products, a common theme from the last two decades of research on this topic. Despite any weaknesses, respondents from Washington and Oregon indicated they predict the use of wood in the construction industry will grow more in the next five years compared to steel and concrete. Lastly, the tools architects’ value most for gathering information about building materials have evolved, which means the way industry communicates with architects needs to evolve as well. It is recommended that the forest product industry improves their internet presence, making information more accessible to architects interested in specifying wood.
References
Aberger, E., Koppelhuber, J., Heck, D. 2018. Building information Modeling in timber construction – a solution for planning process, design phases and the unification of scope of works. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Conference on Timber Engineering, August 20-23, Seoul Republic of Korea.
Adair, C., McKeever, D., Gaston, C., Stewart, M. (2013). Wood and other materials used to construct nonresidential buildings in the United States 2011. The Engineered Wood Association (APA).
Asdrubali, F., Ferracuti, B., Lombardi, L., Guattari, C., Evangelisti, L., & Grazieschi, G. (2017). A review of structural, thermo-physical, acoustical, and environmental properties of wooden materials for building applications. Building and Environment, 114, 307-332.
APA. (2018). Structural panel & engineered wood yearbook. The Engineered Wood Association (APA).
Bayne, K., & Taylor, S. (2006). Attitudes to the use of Wood as a Structural Material in Non-residential Building Applications: Opportunities for Growth. Forest and Wood Products Research and Development Corporation, Victoria, Australia.
Buchanan, A. (2016). The challenges for designers of tall timber buildings. In proceedings: World Conference in Timber Engineering (WCTE). Vienna, Austria.
Bysheim, K., Nyrud, A. Q. (2009). Using a predictive model to analyze architects’ intentions of using wood in urban construction. Forest Products Journal. 59(7/8):65-74.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
Emerson, P. (2013). The original Borda count and partial voting. Social Choice and Welfare, 40(2):353-358
Forest Products Lab, (2010). Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service, Madison, Wisconsin.
Gaston, C. (2014). Visual Wood Product Trends in North American Nonresidential Buildings. Forest Products Journal, p. 107-115.
Gaston, C., Kozak, R., O’Connor, J., & Fell, D. (2001). Potential for increased wood-use in North American non-residential markets. Forintek Canada Corp.
Gupta, R. (2005). Stop knocking on wood and get real--Become a complete structural engineer. STRUCTURE Magazine, March 2005, pp. 16-17.
Goetzl, A., & McKeever, D. B. (1999). Building codes: Obstacle or opportunity?. Forest Products Journal, 49(9), 12.
Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J., & Coney, K. A. (2007). Consumer behaviour. Tata McGrawhill.
Hammon, S. (2016). Tall Wood Survey: Identifying and Analyzing the Obstacles of Perception. Perkins & Will Research Journal. 8(1):25-47.
Hemström, K., Mahapatra, K., and Gustavsson, L. (2010). The perceptions of Swedish architects and structural engineers towards use of wood frames in multi-story buildings. PHD Candidate. Mid Sweden University, Sweden.
IBM corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Janse, G. (2005). European Co-operation and Networking in Forest Communication. European Forest Institute.
Johnsson, H., Meiling, J.H. (2009). Defects in offsite construction: timber module prefabrication. Construction Management and Economics. 27(7):667-681
Juslin, H., & Hansen, E. (2002). Strategic marketing in the global forest industries. Authors Academic Press.
Karacebeyli, E., & Douglas, B. (2013). CLT Handbook-US Edition. FPInnovations and Binational Softwood Lumber Council, Point-Claire, Quebec.
Koppelhuber, J, Bauer, B., Wall, J., Heck, D. (2017). Industrialized timber building systems for an increased market share – a holistic approach targeting construction management and building economics. Procedia Engineering 171 (2017) 333-340
King, W. (1996). Adoption and diffusion research in marketing: an overview. In: Proceedings. Fall Conference. American Marketing Association, pp. 665-684.
Knowles, C., Theodoropoulos, C., Griffin, C., and Allen, J. (2011). Oregon design professig onals views on structural building products in green buildings: implications for wood. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 41(2):390-400.
Kozak, R.A. and Cohen, D.H. (1997). How specifiers learn about structural materials. Wood and Fiber Science. 29(4):381-396.
Kozak, R.A. and Cohen, D.H. (1999). Architects and structural engineers: An examination of wood design and use in nonresidential construction. Forest Products Journal. 49(4):37.
Kitek Kuzman, M., Sandberg, D. (2017). Comparison of timber-house technologies and initiatives supporting use of timber in Slovenia and in Sweden – the state of the art. iForest. 10:930:938
Laguarda Mallo, M. F., and Espinoza, O. (2015). Awareness, perceptions and willingness to adopt cross-laminated timber by the architecture community in the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production. 94:198-210.
Lähtinen, K., Toppinen, A., Suojanen, H., Stern, T., Ranacher, L., Burnard, M., & Kuzman, M. K. (2017). Forest Sector Sustainability Communication in Europe: a Systematic Literature Review on the Contents and Gaps. Current forestry reports, 3(3), 173-187.
Larasatie, P., Guerrero, J., Conroy, K., Hall, T., Hansen, E., & Needham, M. (2018). What Does the Public Believe about Tall Wood Buildings? An Exploratory Study in the US Pacific Northwest. [IN PRESS].
Le Roux, S., Stiegleier, M. 2016. Investigating the interaction of building information modeling and lean construction in the timber industry. In Proceedings of the 2016 World Conference on Timber Engineering, August 22-23, 2016, Vienna, Austria.
Markström, E., Kitek Kuzman, M., Bystedt, A., Sandberg, D., Fredriksson, M. (2018). Swedish architects view of engineered wood products in buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production. 181:33-41.
Microsoft, (2013). Microsoft Office Excel. Retrieved 2014 from: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/excel/.
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338.
O'Connor, J., Kozak, R., Gaston, C., & Fell, D. (2003). Wood Opportunities in Non-Residential Buildings: A Roadmap for the Wood Products Industry (Special Publication No. SP-46). UBC and Forintek Canada Corp., Vancouver, Canada.
O’Connor, J. (2004). Survey on actual service lives for North American buildings. In Woodframe housing durability and disaster issues conference, Las Vegas (pp. 1-9).
O'Connor, J., Kozak, R., Gaston, C., and Fell, D. (2004). Wood use in nonresidential buildings: Opportunities and barriers. Forest Products Journal. 54(3):19.
Oregon Forest Resource Institute (OFRI). (2017). Oregon Forest Facts 2017-18 Edition. Retrieved from: https://www.oregonforests.org/sites/default/files/2017-05/OFRI_FactsFacts_1718_WEB.pdf
Polikar, R. (2006). Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits and systems magazine, 6(3), 21-45.
Robichaud, F., Kozak, R., & Richelieu, A. (2009). Wood use in nonresidential construction: A case for communication with architects. Forest Products Journal, 59(1/2), 57.
Roos, A., Woxblom, L. & McCluskey, D. 2010. The influence of architects and structural engineers on timber in construction – perceptions and roles. Silva Fennica 44(5): 871–884.
Roth, T. (2015). Educational Needs Assessment of Designers in West Coast States: Architects. Oregon State University, United States. (M.S. Thesis)
Schindler, C. (2007). Information-Tool-Technology: Contemporary digital fabrication as part of a continuous development of process technology as illustrated with the example of timber construction. Proceedings of the 27th ACADIA Conference 2007, Halifax, Canada.
Showalter, J., Douglas, B., Kam-Biron, M. (2015). Changes to the 2015 National Design Specification (NDS) for wood construction and the inclusion of cross-laminated timber. ASCE. p. 2762-2767.
Sinha, A., Gupta, R., & Kutnar, A. (2013). Sustainable Development and Green Buildings. Wood Industry/Drvna Industrija, 64(1).
Softwood Lumber Council. (2018, May 8). Retrieved from http://www.softwoodlumber.org/programs/softwood-non-residential.html
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2016). California’s forest resources: forest inventory and analysis, 2001–2010. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture Publication.
Washington Forest Protection Association (WFPA). (2018, May 22). Sustainable forestry. Retrieved from http://www.wfpa.org/sustainable-forestry/
Wood Works. (2018a, May 8). Why wood? Cost Savings. Retrieved from http://www.woodworks.org/why-wood/
Wood Works. (2018b, May 8). Innovations in Wood: Emory Point. Retrieved from http://www.woodworks.org/wp-content/uploads/CS-Emory-Point1.pdf
Williamson, T., O'Connor, J., Martinson, K. L., (2009). Research, technology transfer, and education needs assessment for non-residential wood structures in California. General technical report FPL-GTR-183. Madison, WI: USDA-Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. p.10.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts published in the journal are open access and copyrighted according to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) which requires attribution to the author, but can be readily shared and adapted. BioProducts Business allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
